We go to the cinema 
The central aesthetic problem of every film critic, amateur or professional, is undoubtedly to identify those characters in the film in question and those qualities that can be considered "artistic." However, there does not appear in that regard, a proper theory for "judging a movie." And it is more difficult to land a theory when you consider that the film is a collaboration plural, that only the director has a strong artistic personality can join and lead according to a precise idea and sensitivity. It becomes important to determine whether the figure of the director is part of some current recent appearance. Or, if it follows its own line. Also, what other films may have affected or have points in contact with the work in question? Therefore, the critical method more appropriate in my view, is to watch the movie without bothering to find out the means by which an effect has been reached, and then try to investigate the historical-critical orientation, which is important to answer questions : What place does the film in the context of his previous works? It continues the line of development, or is it a film of him? It 's more or less challenging than the other? Turning to the analysis, itself, will need to examine the narrative structure the film to determine if the lines of the story are neat and orderly in major and minor. If there is a conflict and how it is set. If the story has a logical consistency. If the characters are well defined and have, in turn, psychological coherence, giving an opinion on the subject, the script, the use of plastic film. In summary, if the structure is unitary. Determined that, you can proceed to analyze the theme of the film, identifying what are the ideas that pervade the central theme and which can be coordinated, giving the film a perfect unity. How can one express the theme with a full definition, clear and concise. If the theme of the note has a real and safe and the likelihood of a living humanity. A further analysis should be performed on medium of film to determine if there is a real inspiration consistent with the theme of the film, considering: the scenery the costume, the makeup . The recovery , considering: angle, area, composition of the painting, lighting, photography, color. The acting, considering: the choice of actors, accession to the character. The sound , considering: the dialogue, music, sound effects. Assembly, considering: the rhythm of the scenes, sequences throughout the film. The director , considering: Consistency is always if it reaches style advocated. The final assessment will cover the run ' general aesthetics determining whether you think the film failed, completely, in terms of art. What are possibly the best sequences. If the film reaches its unity and harmony and gives us a plausible theme, translated from the consistent effective medium of film. Let
! Maybe we will stop absorbing film cassette, unless you want, for once, spend two hours vanish.
